The choice of the band continuing on is not reliant on the position the deceased held in the band. Sure if your lead singer dies and they were as charismatic as someone like a Jim Morrison, or Shannon Hoon, the replacement is darn near impossible. However in both of these cases these bands have carried on. I am sure that you are rolling your eyes right now and saying; "The Doors ended after MOJO died. Vahle you idiot". And you would be correct if you felt that The Doors were Jim, Ray, John and Robby. But the remaining Doors members have played shows after Jim's death with different front men. (Many many many years later) In fact if you can dig it up they actually played with Patrick Monahan (Train) a few times, as well as, rock legend Ian Astbury (The Cult). So it is still The Doors with a different guy singing right? Depending on how you answer this question is really what will determine your view on this. If you say yes then I agree with you. If you say no then I agree with you as well. For those of you say yes it is still The Doors because Robby, Ray and John were still there and they used The Doors moniker; then I get why you say yes. The core is still there and the bands name did not change. If you say heck no; when Jim died the original line up died and so they are not the true Doors; then I get it as well. It truly is a circular debate.
Here is how I look at it. Did they create new music after the loss of said band member? If they have, then I hold true that they are still the band by the name the once were. If they do not make new music; then to me they only have someone, playing cover, for the lost band-mate. So in that sense; as much as I agree that Ian Astbury singing with The Doors was great; it still was not The Doors. Ian sang with them; but they were never The Doors. Bands like Alice in Chains, AC/DC, Blind Melon, Lynyrd Skynyrd all to me were bands that truely moved on after thier loss. They all made new music with a new band-mate.





