Pretty broad question to ask I know, however it has always made me wonder about artists passing in their younger years, and how they would have been perceived if they had just burned out. Would Jim Morrison become such a drunk that his antics would have gotten old? Would he have cleaned up his act? Would Jimi and Janice have done the same? No one will ever know. What we do know that music fans hold them in such high regard for what they did in their short time on this earth; that their perceived problems did not over-shadow their musical genius.Going back to Michael Jackson; he was not as fortunate. We can not be certain that the allegations made over and over about his particular taste for young boys were true; however we can be certain that it did do damage to his reputation and his fan base. One fan in particular; me. I am not judging the man by any means, god knows I have many flaws, however my respect level went down over the course of time and the increase of his eccentricities. If his unfortunate demise had occurred earlier in his career he might be remembered all together differently; such the likes of Jim and Janice.
More importantly would these fallen artists stayed relevant? Would there be new music and a new evolution of their music? There have been artists who have pulled off such a grand stunt; a few come to mind like Aerosmith, Alice Cooper, and, Ronnie James Dio. My belief is that some of them would fall into the Jackson category; their music would have gotten stale and their antics intolerable.
Which bring me back to the never ending rock & roll question: "Is it better to burn out or to fade away?". In my opinion: burn out.
